Oceanwide Expeditions3 reviews
This score is based on 3 genuine reviews submitted via BritainReviews since 2026.
Featured Reviews
Reviews (3)
No reviews yet!
Find companies you have experience with and write reviews about them! Your reviews contribute to a more transparent market and improve the reliability of companies.Pink ice mornings and staff who actually remember your name
camping on the ice, quiet kayak trips, some scrambling up snowy ridges and plenty of zodiac rides. The wildlife was ridiculous — whales close enough to hear, seals dozing on bergs and penguins wherever we landed. What really made it for me though was the team: they learnt everyone’s names, checked in like friends, shared stories and even turned round laundry in half a day which felt proper luxury out there. The briefings were clear, daily plans sensible, and I always felt safe. If I had a tip, it’s to bring a few layers you can actually move in and a sense of humour for weather delays. Go if you fancy real adventure with people who care — I’m still buzzing about it.
Quiet after booking
don’t expect customer relations to reply, though the trip itself was mostly fine and I’m oddly relieved it wasn’t worse. Booking went smoothly and the ship ran to schedule, but the proactive part — resolving a missed call-off — was missing. We were meant to circumnavigate Svalbard including Kvitoya, which was the whole point for us, but that leg was skipped. They issued a logbook that never mentions it and, when we asked for a partial refund because visits to Kvitoya will be banned from 2025, silence followed. Two months without any response is hard to excuse for a company charging tens of thousands of euros. My advice: get everything in writing, chase them by phone immediately, and be prepared to escalate. Still, I’m glad other onboard services were acceptable, so in the end it could have been worse.
Missed the point of the trip, but not everything was useless
would they actually go? Would weather or whatever be the excuse? I asked around, read the small print, and in the end I decided to take the plunge. Happened to be last summer. First day on board felt promising. The ship looked good. The crew were polite, often helpful. A lot of guests seemed excited. I told myself, hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
I’m writing this because the worst, partly, did happen. We never got to Kvitøya. That alone would have been annoying. Trouble is, it felt avoidable. The captain and expedition leader decided not to position the ship anywhere near it. Not because of obvious, immediate danger that everyone could see, but because they chose an alternative plan that kept us busy elsewhere. They said it was about safety. Later, the company’s replies mixed safety talk with references to their terms and conditions and some vague process. I’m not stupid; if the weather had truly been impossible, I’d accept that. But there were enough comments, from other passengers and from what was said on board, that made me think this was more a commercial decision than an absolute no-go. It felt like the main attraction was swapped out for “a full day of activities” — which was fine in itself, except that I paid for, and expected, a voyage really defined by that one place.
After we docked back, the disappointment grew into frustration because getting a refund or meaningful compensation wasn’t simple. They offered a discount on a future trip. A decent gesture might have been a partial refund, or a real attempt to make good in a way that recognised we missed the core of the itinerary. Instead, the offer felt like a voucher to sell us another voyage. It wasn’t transferable and it had strings. That rubbed salt in the wound. Over the next months, communication dropped off. Emails went unanswered for long spells. At times it felt like being ignored, frankly. That lack of clarity made a bad situation worse.
Now, to be fair, I should say the on-board experience wasn’t all bad. The guides did their best with shore excursions, lectures were interesting, and the food was decent. I enjoyed aspects of the ship life. You do meet nice people on these trips and there were moments I would happily relive — the wildlife sightings, a calm evening on deck, some good conversations. So it’s not a total write-off. I can see why some people come away pleased; if everything goes to plan they might have a brilliant cruise.
But for me the question of whether the company respects the programme and customers’ rights remained. When I raised the point about EU consumer protection and tried to push for a resolution that reflected we hadn’t received the main service, the responses were legalistic and defensive. References to terms and conditions did not answer the moral point: is it acceptable to keep the full payment when a core element is omitted? I don’t think so. The process of getting attention took months and some outside help. I ended up involving consumer advice channels because it seemed the only way to make any progress.
Tone-wise, I went from sceptical before booking, to briefly hopeful on arrival, to quite annoyed by the decision not to position the ship, and then to a weary persistence as I tried to get some closure. By the end I was a bit more resigned than raging. The company’s crew did what they could in the moment, and some staff were decent. The administrative and aftercare side let the whole thing down. It’s one thing to adapt an itinerary for safety. It’s another to let the advertised highlight vanish without transparent justification and then offer a vague compensation that feels like a sales pitch.
Advice I’d give? Don’t rely on the name of a voyage as a promise without pushing for clear answers before you hand over a large sum. Ask directly what will happen if the main destination can’t be reached, and what compensation policy applies. If you value that specific place above all else, be ready to walk away or at least to accept there might be a fight for your rights afterwards.
Would I book with them again? Possibly, but only if there were clearer assurances and a better customer care track record. If you’re after general expedition vibes and don’t mind some unpredictability, you might enjoy parts of the trip. If you’re paying a premium mainly for that one site, be cautious. I left with mixed feelings: some memorable moments on board, a sour aftertaste about the core promise, and the sense that customers need to be more forceful to get proper answers.
About Oceanwide Expeditions
Oceanwide Expeditions is a cruise operator specialising in expedition voyages to polar and remote regions, including Antarctica, the Arctic and destinations such as Svalbard and Greenland. The company provides ship-based travel with guided landings and activities focused on wildlife and natural environments. Trips are aimed at travellers seeking small-ship exploration and educational experiences, typically supported by onboard staff such as guides and lecturers. Operations are based in the Netherlands.
This information is based on publicly available data and is provided for orientation purposes only.
Details
Contact Information
Categories Oceanwide Expeditions
Holidays and Trips | Special Trips Reviews & Experiences | Winter Sports and Active Reviews & Experiences
Page Statistics
Last update: May 2026
Advertising notice: Some links are affiliate links. For purchases made through them, we may receive a commission – at no additional cost to you.